The only thing [cops]…do is…sweep everyone up in antiprostitution policing, and then somehow assert that this is being done in the name of combating human trafficking. – Kate Mogulescu
Neither Addiction Nor Epidemic
A married doctor who romped with an escort in hospital can treat patients again – after claiming cycling has helped him quit his sex addiction. Father-of-two Dr Rupert Pemsel…had sex with the prostitute…But when she blackmailed him for £10,000 he came clean to the General Medical Council (GMC) and last March was suspended for “deplorable and morally reprehensible” misconduct. Now he has been given the green light by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service to retrain as a family GP after claiming he has turned his life around…
The UK media has a bizarre fondness for kindergarten words like “romp” and for obsessing about whether someone in a news story has spawned or not. But the idea that doctors fucking whores is even remotely out of the ordinary is hilarious; when I was working in New Orleans, probably 20% of my income came from MDs. Still, the main story here is the way privileged men use “sex addiction” as an excuse when they get caught, a fact not lost on the Ozzman:
Ozzy Osbourne has backtracked on claims he was suffering from sex addiction, which he made in the aftermath of an affair last year…“I’m in a fucking rock band, aren’t I?…There have always been groupies. I just got caught, didn’t I?…I don’t think I’m a fucking sex addict”…
You’re absolutely right, Ozzy, because there is no such fucking thing as a sex addict. As my friend Brooke Magnanti once put it, he might as well have claimed he was Father Christmas.
Australian police practice “NHI” as well:
…During the 1980s and 1990s, the Australian authorities now say, gangs of teenagers in Sydney hunted gay men for sport, sometimes forcing them off the cliffs to their deaths. But the police, many of whom had a reputation for hostility toward gay men, often carried out perfunctory investigations that overlooked the possibility of homicide…Now the police in New South Wales…are reviewing the deaths of 88 men between 1976 and 2000 to determine whether they should be classified as anti-gay hate crimes…
Here’s an interesting article on regulated brothels in 19th-century St. Petersburg. As in France and Italy, sex workers were confined to specific brothels in an attempt to control them, and as in the US the writer clings doggedly to the myth that laws and cops were in place to “help” us, and just can’t imagine why so many women refused to submit to this “protection”.
Have you noticed we’ve heard almost nothing about “Super Bowl sex trafficking” this year? Even Sports Illustrated, not exactly known for hard-hitting investigatie journalism, is calling it a debunked myth and quoting those who oppose it (though, alas, no sex workers):
…The Global Alliance Against Traffic In Women makes the case that by focusing on the sex trade, authorities are taking resources that could be used to investigate [actual crimes]…there are signs that the Super Bowl Sex-Trafficking Myth might be splintering. Minal Davis, the special adviser to the [Houston] mayor on human trafficking, believes that the “sensationalistic” approach at previous Super Bowls “hurts the messaging” and minimizes the severity…
I’m honestly surprised the “forced sex trafficking abortions” trope didn’t catch on:
Any woman seeking an abortion in South Dakota would have to be given the name and telephone number of an [anti-sex worker] organization…under a measure introduced…[by] Dan Kaiser…[who pretends] the idea is…an educational measure that might help get women out of dangerous and violent situations…
Quite Possibly the Most Uptight Nerd Ever (#563)
A new app…aims to make it easier and safer for sex workers to meet their clients…While sex work is legal in some Australian states, there are a number of risks for both parties. Rendevu hopes to solve that problem. Developer Reuben Coppa said sex workers could list themselves on the application list, show when they were working, what type of appointments they were taking and their price points…Both clients and escorts can write and read reviews about their experience. The app also tracks location and requires credit card details…[to] guarantee the amount of the booking…So far, traffic on the app has been high but the number of bookings has been fewer than expected — there have been about 100 since the launch…
…in the densely populated Greater Toronto Area…girls are recruited at school by young males and taken to local motels or condominiums, where they engage in sex work. Most continue to live at home…[prohibitionist] Katarina MacLeod [parrots,] “You have these guys making regular girls feel special, buying them things and taking them shopping…[The men] know exactly how to build dependence…Girls as young as 13 are getting recruited in”…
The law is an ass, and so is this judge:
Claims that First Lady Melania Trump worked as a high-end…escort before she married businessman, billionaire and now President Donald Trump will be argued over in a Maryland court…[after] a Montgomery County judge ruled that Melania Trump’s $150 million defamation lawsuit against a Clarksburg blogger will continue to trial, saying the blog posts implied she acted as a prostitute…”The court believes most people, when they hear the words ‘high-end escort’ that describes a prostitute. There could be no more defamatory statement than to call a woman a prostitute”…
Fuck you. Judge Sharon Burrell; there are far worse things a woman can be than a prostitute, such as a hypocritical and prudish politician.
Alas, Seattle “officials” think harm reduction principles only apply to drug use:
Officials in Seattle…approved the nation’s first “safe-injection” sites for users of heroin and other illegal drugs, calling the move a drastic but necessary response to an epidemic of addiction that is claiming tens of thousands of lives each year. The sites — which offer addicts clean needles, medical supervision and quick access to drugs that reverse the effects of an overdose — have long been popular in Europe. Now, with the U.S. death toll rising, the idea is gaining traction in a number of American cities, including Boston, New York City and Ithaca, N.Y. While [prohibitionists] say the sites promote illegal drug use, supporters say they can keep people alive and steer them toward treatment…
Here’s a constantly-updated spreadsheet of sex worker advertising sites; I can’t speak for its contents, but the more resources for sex workers impacted by the censorship of Backpage, the better.
O’ Canada. Unlike most U.S. sex trafficking articles, the Toronto report seems to be clearly only about forced under age trafficking which none of us would support.
It also makes a good distinction:
“Unlike sex workers who have chosen the trade, trafficking victims rarely get to keep the money they bring in. And they have little say over what sex acts they perform.”
Except that’s basically bullshit. Even the rare coerced sex workers are almost never the abject slaves portrayed in prohibitionist BDSM wanking fantasies.
Regarding the Canadian story, note that in the CBC version of the same article, the young woman is 18, not 17: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/human-sex-trafficking-domestic-1.3956214 . I haven’t read them yet, but at a cursory glance, they seem otherwise identical.
I’ve now read the article. I happened to hear and record the broadcast version of the CBC story, which is slightly different from the online article. (CBC is the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, so they’ll often have a radio version of a story and a related online article.)
Daveinphoenix1 says that this story is about forced underage trafficking. But in neither the article nor the broadcast piece was there any mention of anyone using force or the threat of force to get the subject of the story, Vanessa, to engage in sex-work. If she had talked about force, I’m pretty sure that that would have been in the story. The article makes it sound like Vanessa had no idea what was going to happen when she got in the car with those guys, but the radio version makes it clear that her friend had already talked to her about doing sex-work. Both versions imply that her pimp took all of her money and only recently has started to let her keep “some” of the cash she earns, but I suspect that the journalist is manipulating the story here. What Vanessa actually says is that, to pay for the room, the pimp took the whole amount that the FIRST client had given her. He must have let her keep money from subsequent clients, otherwise why would she have continued to do the work? She’d just met this pimp, so she wasn’t in love with him, and she was still living with her parents, so she wasn’t a runaway who needed a place to stay. The CBC reporter is trying her best to make Vanessa’s story fit the stereotypical trafficking narrative, but it’s not really fitting into that straightjacket.
As for Daveinphoenix1’s belief that Vanessa was underage at 16, the age of consent in Canada is 16. If that guy in his forties who was Vanessa’s first client had had sex with her for FREE, that would have been perfectly legal. Admittedly, most Canadians don’t know that, so 16 SOUNDS underage to them, as it does to Daveinphoenix1.
Good comments by Chester Brown. The media may be trying to make it sound like exploitative even if it wasn’t.
The age of consent is 18 years where the sexual activity “exploits” the young person when it involves prostitution, pornography or occurs in a relationship of authority, trust or dependency (e.g., with a teacher, coach or babysitter). Sexual activity can also be considered exploitative based on the nature and circumstances of the relationship, e.g., the young person’s age, the age difference between the young person and their partner, how the relationship developed (quickly, secretly, or over the Internet) and how the partner may have controlled or influenced the young person.
Regarding Melania Trump’s suit; the Judge may be an imbecile, but he also has a point. Maybe the perception should not be, but as you have documented rather thoroughly in this blog there is a widespread perception that Prostitution is horrible and Prostitutes are at best severely damaged goods. Yes, it would be nice if our First Lady was willing to say outright “I was a whore and a damned good one, and look at the husband I found!”, but honestly it’s a little much to expect.