I’ve noticed a growing tendency for politicians, bureaucrats, and complicit “journalists” to say “law enforcement” (not “law enforcement personnel” or whatever) instead of “cops”, “a cop”, “a gang of cops”, “a gang of goons”, etc. “Law enforcement” is a concept, not a person or persons. After the recent murder of Alex Pretti by ICE goons, Trumpist henchwoman Noem claimed he had “attacked law enforcement”; I was very impressed with this man’s magical power to attack abstractions, and wondered if he also had the ability to attack, say, “representative democracy”, “higher education”, or “Elizabethan drama”. In the real world, as opposed to the one inhabited by apologists for state violence where people randomly drop dead near cops and cops’ guns regularly fire on their own, “law enforcement” can only be “attacked” by politicians (at least in theory; it never happens in actuality).
You may wonder why this matters to anyone who isn’t a pathological pedant, but when the phrase “law enforcement” is used to mean individual humans, any resistance to the human behavior of those humans is equated to resistance to the concept of law, i.e. anarchism (which authoritarians use to mean “criminality”), and defending oneself against violence perpetrated by employees of the state is painted as an attack on all of society; it’s nothing but another version of “l’état, c’est moi”, but extended to every brain-damaged goon instead of being reserved for the head of state. That’s why Trumpists love it; you should not ape them. And it’s especially hypocritical coming from people who are fully capable of understanding why equating individual humans with concepts is bad when it’s politicians equating themselves with the concept of “democracy” or health bureaucrats equating themselves with the concept of “science”.
