O God, protect me from my friends, that they have not power over me.
Thou hast giv’n me power to protect myself from thy bitterest enemies. – William Blake
As I pointed out in “So Close and Yet So Far”, “the allies of sex workers [often] make arguments that, though well-meant and partially correct, contain some glaring flaw that spreads disinformation, undermines the work of other advocates or, in the worst cases, actually cedes ground to the enemy.” But every once in a while one of these allies says something so wrong, so completely off-base, offensive and counterproductive, that I just want to slap her and suggest she join the prohibitionists because at least that way, her statements would be properly seen as attacks. Allow me to illustrate: someone “tweeted” a link to this article just a little while after I read the news that the ACLU was joining with the EFF to challenge one narrow section of California’s odious Proposition 35, and given its headline (“ACLU supports decriminalizing prostitution”)
If one consenting adult pays another consenting adult for sex, “it’s not the government’s business,” said Barbara Keshen, an attorney for the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union. But the government doesn’t see it that way. Known as the world’s oldest profession, prostitution remains illegal in 49 states, with Nevada the exception…
It’s all downhill from that first sentence, which is instantly followed by a statement which relies on a confirmation bias to make decriminalization seem like a weird idea, and the listed “exception” actually isn’t one! American prostitution law is not remotely representative of the Western world; imagine the difference in the reader’s mind had this sentence expressed the truth: “Though many activities around it are restricted or criminalized in different countries, prostitution itself is legal in every populous Western nation, with the United States the only exception”. Furthermore, the Nevada system is not even close to decriminalization; in fact, it’s the most narrow and restrictive legalization system in the world, so close to criminalization it can barely be differentiated from it, and not one single sex worker rights group supports it. But the reporter is a typical member of a profession now dominated by credulous halfwits, so her ignorance is no surprise; I expect better from a civil rights lawyer.
…”I think it’s unfortunate that some women are forced into the situation of prostitution by economic and other situations,” Keshen said. “But making them criminals is not the right answer”…The ACLU…opposes any state regulation of prostitution…[between] consenting adults. “Prostitution laws violate the right of individual privacy, because there are penal sanctions for private sexual contact between consenting adults, whether it’s for recreation or money…it’s not the government’s business unless someone gets hurt.” Keshen said the ACLU also backs decriminalizing prostitution because “the laws represent a direct form of discrimination against women…generally the women are stigmatized and penalized, while generally the male customers are not.”
…Portsmouth Deputy Police Chief Corey MacDonald said…prostitution often goes hand-in-hand with illicit drug use and other crimes, while traveling prostitutes tend to have security guards who can pose a threat to local officers. That sentiment is shared by…Rockingham County Attorney [James Reams]…”Classically, people involved with prostitution are also involved with drugs, guns and other crime”…Reams [also] said…the state of Nevada “banished” legalized prostitution to rural areas, at so-called ranches, which have been studied over the years. “Former prostitutes have said it’s akin to slavery,” he said. “They all complain about the way they were treated, and I think that’s pretty troubling”…
FYI: I’ve never heard of a single touring escort who travels with “security guards”; how could she possibly afford it? MacDonald is the typical semi-literate cop who gets his information from other cops, but Reams has no excuse; if he’s intellectually able to comprehend the studies of Nevada brothels he’s also capable of understanding that legalization is nothing like decriminalization and of reading methodologically-sound studies that refute his “whore as criminal” mythology. But since that would mean thinking critically about the status quo, it ain’t gonna happen. In fact, he purposefully mentions the buzzword “slavery”, so you just know what’s coming next:
…state Rep. Laura Pantelakos said she understands why some would want to decriminalize prostitution between consenting adults, but said…”it runs into a very slippery slope, which is why I think it should be kept illegal. I would be afraid of the consequences.” One of the consequences, she said, is the risk that minors would be sold for sex. Even if there was a house of ill repute around the corner and they were all 21, I think you would end up with minors in there,” she said. “The thought of a 14-year-old being forced into prostitution makes me sick to my stomach.”
…”For me, the right answer is a good education from the start, a stable family from the start,” she said. “People don’t choose to become prostitutes.”