There is not and in fact cannot be any such thing as “legitimate” authority, whether that authority is chosen by elections, lots, birth, examining goat entrails, or pulling swords out of lakes. – “Illegitimate”
One of the major themes of The Grand Illusion (1937) is that class differences are more powerful and enduring than national boundaries, so the ruling classes on the two sides of any given war have more in common with one another than they do with the people they rule. This has been true at least since the Middle Ages, and possibly much longer; in the present day it is more true than it ever has been, both within any given country and across national boundaries. Posturing politicians pretend to be the sworn enemies of other politicians, only to play kissy-face with one another when they don’t realize there’s a camera around. They claim to be the champions of “the people”, but in actuality those “people” are no more than a source of power to them, as interchangeable, expendable and disposable as lumps of coal thrown into a furnace. And while the conflict between politicians of different parties may be real, it is not the conflct of a life-or-death struggle as they pretend (and their followers believe), but the conflict of two friends playing a game or arguing over which fast-food restaurant makes the best cheeseburger. Two of the contenders in the next US presidential election changed political parties after middle-age (ie, well after their actual beliefs, rather than their publicly-claimed ones, were set in stone) in order to further their ambitions, but you’d barely know it by the fanatical chanting of their fans and their attempts to out-Herod Herod. And if you’d like to destroy your belief that US parties actually have any kind of solid basis in ideology, just take a look at the avowed positions of the two contenders from the last presidential election and compare them with both their actual actions in political office and the supposed political “wing” of the parties they represented. And yet I’ve seen friends argue heatedly and even become estranged over their loyalties to these opportunistic sociopaths; a message board I used to frequent completely imploded over name-calling (“libtards”, “RepubliKKKans”, etc) and other ugly, childish behavior during the 2008 election. No matter what natural affiliations one might expect a politician to have due to race, sex, religion, economic background, or any other characteristic, those all become casualties of the quest for power. You know which countries are the largest exporters of surveillance and other military and police technologies used by brutal governments to suppress their people? China, Israel and the United States. And none of them is especially concerned whether their customers claim to be communist, anti-Semitic, democratic or anything else, because in actuality, they’re all on the same side: the side of the power elite. And until the masses discard both their cherished belief in god-king “leaders” who will save them, protect them and care for them, and their ugly, primitive lust for power over other humans, that power elite will continue regarding them as livestock to herd, shear and slaughter as they see fit.
[…] https://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2019/11/05/the-grand-illusion/ […]
It’s oligarchs vs. small “d” democrats, who are seeding to return to return us to what Aristotle considered the best form of government, a constitutionally limited one dominated by the middle class (Politics, Book IV, Chapter 11). We seek a return to the government that Thomas Paine wrote about and dreamed of in his “Rights of Man, Pt. 2,” and other works. The nation of Cooperative Abundance of which Henry Clay dreamed, not the nation of Competitive Scarcity that we have today.
You are aware that Henry Clay fathered eleven children, and the Democrats supported Slavery, Segregation, Eugenics, the Vietnam War, Economic sanctions against the Japanese that lead into the Pearl Harbor attack, the War on Drugs, and Mass Incarceration, right?
That’s why he said ‘small-d democrats’. Words can often have multiple meanings. In this case, ‘democrat’ refers to people who support democracy, not to members of the Democrat Party (which would be capitalized, since it is a brand name).
Thank you Ornithorhynchus. And there was nothing wrong with fathering 11 children when half of your kids would die before puberty, the U.S.had less than 20 million people, and were often needed to work the farm or other businesses, Shane. Your ignorance and lack of knowledge is showing,: please correct it..
The last line brings to mind some interesting parallels.
In Sanskrit, one of the most frequently used words for King is “Nrpa” or “Nrupāla,” a compound word which is dissolved as “Nrūn pālayati iti – the one who looks after the people.” The word for Cowherd is “Gopāla – Go pālayati iti – one who looks after the cows.” Even in modern Indian languages, the verbs descended from this “-pāla” stem denote both nurturance or raising like a child as well as domestication like dogs, sheep, & kine. Kings therefore engage in “human-husbandary,” bringing to mind another royal epithet – Earth-husband (Bhū-pati), & also Earth-Husbander (Bhū-pāla).
Now consider a frequent term in Judeo-Christian religion – “shepherd of the people.” Hindu scriptures called the Upanishadas have a passage describing the relationship between men & the gods – it is compared to that between a cowherd & his flock. With a large enough flock, it is no great loss if one cow or two gets taken away, but it is still a source of great pain to him. Similarly, the loss of one sacrificer or believer, causes great pain to the gods (& also their lackeys, the priests). This is revealed as “a secret that the gods don’t want you to know,” which can give you power over the known deities.
The sheep can very well survive without the shepherd as long as they keep their wits about themselves. It is the shepherd who needs the sheep, convincing them that they’re weak powerless beings that need him for food & safety instead. And that is the nature of all temporal power.
Authority exists only so long as it is recognised as having power.