This tweet from a government agency is not only blatantly false, it’s not even good propaganda. Fentanyl is not only “safe for human consumption”, it’s a powerful pain reliever used in hospitals all over the world. The only reason simpletons (such as those who work for NIDA) believe it’s “bad” or “unsafe” is because due to the war on drugs, it has become harder to get prescription opiates; heroin and other opiates are therefore cut with fillers to extend them and their potency is kicked back up by adding fentanyl, which is easier to smuggle because it’s so concentrated. Of course, because it is so concentrated, even a small error in dosage can be catastrophic. This is not only 100% predictable, it’s so inevitable a consequence it is called the Iron Law of Prohibition.
“Molly” is slang for MDMA, a drug that is not only non-addictive but far safer than alcohol; indeed it is one of the safest drugs known. Its healing properties are obvious to anyone who has ever used it (including yours truly) and to the many researchers who have studied it as a therapy for PTSD; indeed, even the notoriously tight-arsed US FDA has approved more clinical trials and could approve it for general use in about two more years. So why the bad reputation among the ignorant? See the previous paragraph. Most of what is sold as “ecstasy” contains very little MDMA, mostly consisting of methamphetamine and the usual filler garbage. It has such a bad reputation, in fact, that a new term arose to identify comparatively-pure preparations of the drug. And what’s NIDA’s excuse for claiming otherwise? The FDA hasn’t finished casting the magic Spell of Approval yet, which will no doubt make it as safe as legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco (as long as one has the magic Scroll of Prescription on hand, of course).
K2, “spice” and similar drugs are synthetic cannabinoids sold as “legal highs” in places where cannabis, the safest recreational drug known to mankind, is banned. Naturally these drugs are more dangerous than the real thing, because every drug is; however, they’re also far more dangerous than other banned recreational drugs such as MDMA and LSD. So why does anyone use them? Because they can’t get cannabis, of course. Simply put, most drugs aren’t “unsafe for human consumption” when properly-prepared doses are used responsibly; prohibition, however, has been repeatedly proven to be unsafe to humans in any form.
“The FDA hasn’t finished casting the magic Spell of Approval yet, which will no doubt make it as safe as legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco (as long as one has the magic Scroll of Prescription on hand, of course).”
I love this sentence so much! 😀
Interesting that the FDA approves the use of curare and botulinum for medical use, but declares opioids and cannabis “dangerous”
It is a fundamentalist religious stance: You must not have any fun in life except in prayer. It explains basically any prohibition on substances. Note that substances that are unhealthy but do not give you any pleasure never get this type of attention.
The dose makes the poison. You can even OD on water. Hyponatremia or “water intoxication”.
Ethnobotanist Mark Plotkin once said the difference between medicine and poison is dosage.
Not always true (for example, some things are always harmful and accumulate…), but a good first approximation.
The word “synthetic” is doing a lot of work here. Most of which is illegitimate work.
(And it was Paracelsus who is normally credited with the saying “the dose is the poison”)