[To politicians] a stripper is a sex-trafficker is a source of state revenue. – Elizabeth N. Brown
A Nevada brothel worker and an armored truck employee conspired to take at least $100,000 from the former’s workplace over several months…Shiva Zamiri and Jessie Aulelava were arrested…Zamiri started working as the brothel’s bookkeeper last September, and that money was stolen within weeks of her being on the job. A person close to Zamiri identified the unnamed brothel as Sheri’s Ranch…
Out of Control (The Camel’s Nose)
It’s been awhile since we’ve seen a spooge sneaker:
A man has admitted to ejaculating into a female colleague’s coffee several times – but says he fancied her and hoped it would make her notice him. Robert John Lind, of Blaine, Minnesota, pleaded guilty to ejaculating into his colleague’s coffee and over her desk on a number of occasions last year. The woman said she had an ongoing issue with her coffee tasting foul before she caught Lind with his hands near his genitals and a “deer in the headlights” expression near her desk. The victim then noticed, “a large amount of clear liquid on…her desk”…
Cops blatantly lie to justify persecuting peaceful, consensual behavior:
Six men were caught up in a prostitution sting over the weekend by vice and narcotics agents of the Clarksville [Tennessee] Police Department…The ongoing effort is designed not only to reduce this type of activity but also to prevent assaults and robberies against the solicitors. This has become commonplace with online prostitution as the men become easy targets when they are directed to [incalls, a cop mouthpiece lied]…
An hour with London escort Kamillah is $450. But for $100 more, she’ll enter into a nikah mut’ah—a temporary marriage that some Shia say makes sex outside of marriage permissible…Among [her] reviews…[one] satisfied customer concludes: “Allahu Akbar! Had the best mutah experience everr [sic]”…
Because “sending a message” is more important than human life:
Four Chicago-area teenagers faces felony child-pornography charges after uploading a video of themselves having sex to Twitter…Both the sex and the posting of the video were consensual—this is not a rape or “revenge porn” scenario. But…minors who post sexually-oriented images of themselves online or even share them privately with one another can be charged as child pornographers…Who benefits from branding these teens sex predators for life because they dared to explore their sexuality?…
Alternative fee arrangements are all the rage. But beware in Indiana, because the courts have drawn the line at seeking “sex or fellatio in exchange for providing legal services,” suspending a lawyer for a year, without automatic reinstatement, for propositioning an arrested prostitute in exchange for representation…Christopher A. Hollander, worked as a public defender and used the access provided by his position to score the phone number of an unnamed sex worker that he’d previously admired in the classified section…he called her up and offered his services…intending to barter. The exchange never happened because when Hollander met with the prostitute, it turned out to be an undercover cop…Hollander got pinched by a bunch of overzealous cops who seemingly substituted “shits and giggles” for “probable cause” or “reasonable suspicion”…[the cops had stolen the woman’s phone and intercepted his texts]…All they know is that a lawyer claimed to have learned of an accused woman’s plight from a friend of hers and offered representation. There’s absolutely nothing shady about this text…With absolutely no reason to suspect anything but the exercise of someone’s constitutional right to counsel, the cops decided to impersonate the alleged prostitute to set up a meeting with the lawyer. You know, because defending accused criminals is suspicious activity…
Grandstanding female politician in Nevada introduces yet another ludicrous “sex trafficking commode sign” bill. Another grandstanding female politician tries to one-up her by demanding castration as the penalty for “sex trafficking” so as to discourage “these pimps”. Sponsoring politician then huffs that her bill is VEWWY SEEWIUSS and berates second politician for her ball-cutting fantasy. Second politician then doubles down…
Remember, sex work was recriminalized in Rhode Island less than six years ago, largely due to the efforts of cops who wanted in on the “sex trafficking” gravy train:
…police set up [fake]…escort ads…and [entrapped] nearly two dozen men…Providence Police Chief Hugh T. Clements Jr…[bloviated] “Many of these girls are being used, they are being forced into it because of addictions, forced into it by boyfriends and pimps”…Mayor Jorge Elorza…[pretended that] he’s reviewing possible legal action that could be taken against Backpage.com…”It’s dangerous,” Clements said. “We want to send a message to these girls, do not use this page to make money. They could be victims”…
First They Came for the Hookers… (#420)
The Georgia House of Representatives just approved a constitutional amendment to make strip clubs pay for the state’s fight against child sex-trafficking…The amendment’s proponents have barely even bothered to justify why strip club owners should be liable for footing this particular bill. Imagine the outrage if lawmakers were trying similar shenanigans on any other category of business—soliciting an annual fee from gas stations to fight rape, say, or forcing podiatrists to subsidize drunk-driving checkpoints…all adult-entertainment businesses would have to pay $5,000 per year or 1 percent of their revenue, whichever is greater, into a state fund…The bill’s text suggests that consuming alcohol and looking at naked women may entice strip club customers to go forth and sexually exploit children and hence the fee is “necessary” and “reasonable.” It also suggests that strip clubs are a popular venue for shopping for child sex slaves.
Once again: ordinary business practices don’t magically become newsworthy when hookers use them:
Zimbabwean sex workers…are now embracing mobile payment service…in a bid to safeguard their payments…from…clients [who]… violently demand their money back…The sex workers are also able to send pictures and videos of cases of abuse or violence to rights campaigners using social media and other instant messaging platforms…
The first woman to be sentenced for killing a foetus has been handed a 20-year prison term for feticide and neglect of a dependent, despite claiming she gave birth to a stillborn baby. Purvi Patel was bleeding heavily when she entered a hospital emergency room in Indiana in 2013 after giving birth unexpectedly in her bathroom…The prosecution also claimed that Patel had ordered drugs to induce an abortion on the internet [sic]. However, a toxicology report did not find any evidence of the drugs in her system. Patel is the second woman to be charged with feticide in the US, but the first to receive a prison sentence. She was prosecuted under state laws that are [supposedly] intended at targeting illegal abortion providers and prosecuting crimes against pregnant women…
It’s good to see the mainstream media publishing truth about at least one form of sex work:
…Porn is condemned regularly for a rise in labioplasty procedures, a cosmetic surgery that anti-porn activists would have audiences believe is sweeping the globe. The organization Fight the New Drug is entirely devoted “to raising awareness on [porn’s] harmful effects using science, facts, and personal accounts” and almost-charming attempts at youth lingo. They even tell readers that they’re going to “drop some truth bombs” in a listicle called “Ten Porn Stats That Will Blow Your Mind.” Because if there is one thing the young folks can’t get enough of (besides porn) it is a mind-blowing listicle using ancient studies that weren’t peer reviewed. But recent studies looking at porn consumption and depictions of sex in porn actually reveal that it is hardly the life-ruining, woman-hating, healthy-sex-murdering specter we’ve been warned about for so long…
New forms of tyranny are often tested on sex workers first:
…Oregon entrepreneur Lawrence George Owen…owned one restaurant, eight strip clubs, and two adult-video stores in the Portland area…Owen installed ATM machines…and sometimes, customers used the cash to privately pay some strippers for sex. Now Owen faces federal charges for “conspiring to use interstate commerce” in promotion of prostitution…[as] the result…of a nine year joint-effort by Portland’s vice squad and the FBI…Promoting prostitution is only a federal crime under certain circumstances, such as when the perpetrator transports or coerces an individual across state lines for prostitution purposes. Using mail, telephone calls, or other “facilities of interstate commerce” in service of prostitution will also do the trick. But the FBI has no evidence that Owen enticed or transported strip-club employees from outside Oregon, nor that he used mail or telephone calls to help facilitate their prostitution efforts. When the FBI wants to make a case against someone, however, they’ll find a way. In this case, the FBI decided that ATM machines count as “facilities of interstate commerce”…
From what I’ve read about Purvi Patel, she was charged with both feticide and child neglect, and convicted on both charges.
Logically, this seems impossible.
Well, it’s not a cut and dry situation. How you handle cases like this has a direct effect on how you handle cases like this …
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/front-range/longmont/no-murder-charge-will-be-filed-against-dynel-lane-for-removing-baby-from-michelle-wilkins-womb
What I find impossible is that Purvi both killed her foetus in utero, and neglected it after it had been born. Surely, you can only neglect a live born infant. (I don’t pretend to be any expert on US federal and state laws.) I’ve mostly relied for information from the excellent Dr Jen Gunter, a US OB/GYN, here:
https://drjengunter.wordpress.com/2015/03/14/purvi-patel-faces-70-years-in-jail-for-a-premature-delivery/
(and an earlier post)
This shit makes my head hurt.
Beeeecause … on the one hand, she was found guilty of these charges, not by the prosecutor and / or judge – but by a jury of her peers.
Then again, I have some experience with the jury system – and I tend to think the jury selection process is heavily skewed toward picking stupid people (unless those stupid people are black – and the case involves a cop – in which case stupid blacks are excluded because of their color).
But then there’s the issue that – if the legal system is THIS FUCKED UP … we all need to volunteer for the Mars colony and get that up and running but quick!
And I might add … perhaps I’m just sour on jury selection because they didn’t pick me? I got thrown out with the black folk! I’m serious … they “de-selected” about 15 of us … and me and another guy were the only two whites thrown out. And he was most definitely an Obama voter – wtf could I have in common with HIM??
It could have been my long hair – and I got profiled. It was a drug case so maybe they thought I must be a partaker?
Whatever – good thing they booted me. I had already decided that, unless that kid was selling drugs to kids – I was not going to vote him guilty no matter what the evidence!! LOL
It says ”neglect of a dependent”, which I suppose can also apply to a fetus.
Since the fetus was very premature, I guess it can still be considered a fetus even outside the womb.
What bothers me is this sentence:
”Patel maintained that the foetus was stillborn but the prosecution argued that she gave birth to a live foetus that died within a few seconds.”
Even prosecution admits that the fetus died within a few seconds, so what could she have done anyway? I think the prosecution is mostly due to how she tried to get rid of the fetus in a garbage bin afterwards.
Re: “The Mote and the Beam” Article. Is it possible that law enforcement is grabbing onto “trafficking” just as marijuana is becoming legal? This looks very much like law enforcement creating marijuana hysteria after the end of alcohol prohibition. Once again they’re all dressed up with no where to go.
Go to the head of the class!
Then my question is, after the ‘trafficking’ hysteria dies (whenever that is), what will replace it? Will it be something else that was previously seen as acceptable? Or will be circle back and give alcohol prohibition another go?
Gambling?
Doubt it. Too many cities (and therefore their elites) have their entire economy centered around that. Maybe you’ll get a few bans in places that can afford to do without it, but you’ll never get a state like say, Nevada, because a national “War on Gambling”.
That’s why I’m thinking we are indeed looking at the end of the world as we know it. The busybodies lost the war on alcohol, lost the war against civil rights, lost (for the most part) the war against tobacco (despite heavy regulation, warning labels, etc.), and are rapidly losing the war against homosexuals and recreational drugs as gay marriage and pot become legal in more and more places. Whores and their customers are the only group left that inspires pretty much universal revulsion across the entire mainstream political spectrum.
So, if it starts to look like people are going to start pulling a Washington or Colorado, or even opt for a system like Nevada’s (because for all it’s flaws, Nevada’s system at the very least is an admission to the reality that sex work cannot be totally eliminated), then that’s it. Unless humans suddenly gain the ability to reproduce asexually and sex itself can be outlawed, the busybodies will blow up the world before that can happen.
Maybe the next group will be atheists?
The tobacco issue is different from the others. Tobacco use has dropped hugely in the last 60 years. The laws are not an outright ban, and users and sellers aren’t jailed. The thing that has curtailed the very most addictive drug is education.
I think education would work to curtail both abuse to people who are forced into work of any kind. People can be educated to report abuse. And education can be used to end the persecution of adult consenting sex workers and their clients.
Can they at least choose something I don’t like just for once?
Would you join with them if they did?
No, but it would be nice to get them off my back for a while.
I’m reading about mobile payment services. No, it doesn’t suddenly become bad or become good or become in some other way newsworthy because a hooker uses it, but myself I’m glad to see it getting more attention. So hooray for hookers if they’re making us more aware of this liberating technology!