Sex work prohibitionism is entirely based in negative emotions such as envy, resentment, and bigotry, plus the most common and destructive of all sexual perversions: the need to inflict one’s own will on non-consenting individuals. As I and others have explained, this is why sex workers can’t help “incels”: it isn’t sex that they want, it’s ownership. If they just wanted sex they could pay for it like any other man, but that isn’t enough for them; they want to own women like slaves because they believe themselves to be entitled to unlimited sexual access like the successful men they call “alphas” (whom they imagine get sex without paying). The reason I’m mentioning this is because these are the emotions and twisted cognitive processes behind last week’s “thot audit”, a trollfest in which deeply-pathetic manbabies tried to make themselves feel powerful and frighten ill-informed sex workers by threatening to report them to the IRS for tax evasion.
There’s just so much to unpack here, starting with the highly popular but largely-erroneous notion that sex workers don’t pay taxes (most visible in the ignorant proclamation of wannabe allies that “we should legalize and tax it”); sorry, y’all, but most of us know who Al Capone was and we aren’t stupid. Failing to placate a gang of thieves who have been granted the power to move without let or hindrance to collect their pound of flesh from anyone currently or formerly alive, and who have absolutely no compunction against ruining any given person’s life on a whim, is just plain stupid. Yes, a lot of our income is cash, and yes, most of us put something other than “prostitute” on our tax returns (I used to put “escort service owner”, now I put “writer”). But full-time sex workers do pay taxes, not only because it’s foolish to attempt to cheat the devil of his due, but also because we don’t want to be locked out of the financial system; owning a house, property and credit cards is definitely worth giving the government its blood money. Do some part-timers and dilettantes only declare the income from their “straight” jobs and keep the sex work cash quiet? Undoubtedly, but the same goes for anyone with a side gig. Singling out sex workers has nothing to do with whether we pay some lawhead idea of a “fair share” or not, and everything to do with trying to hurt women out of a frustrated sense of male entitlement; though men control just about everything else, women have a solid lock on the sphere of hetero sexuality…the thing most men care about more than anything else.
But since lots of writers had stuff to say about this, I feel no need to duplicate their efforts. Let’s start with Elizabeth Nolan Brown in Reason:
…Where to begin with the grossness and pointlessness of these pursuits?…What kind of bootlicking busybodies spend their spare time worrying about whether individual strangers are paying enough in taxes, much less take the time to report them? Then there’s the ignorance. Plenty of solo sex workers, adult entertainers, and models do pay taxes, just like other independent contractors…Sex workers have the same incentives as everyone else to stay on the good side of Uncle Sam…Lastly, there’s the futility of the whole business. Blogger Roosh V, who was one of the men leading the #thotaudit charge, pointed his followers to a page of the IRS website for reporting tax evaders, even suggesting that the feds might reward them for rounding up hoes. But…reporting someone requires you to know a lot about the person you’re turning in, including her full name and address—information random dudes online aren’t likely to have for the ladies they’re tattling on…even if they did have all the correct information, there’s little likelihood that the IRS would care. The page specifically notes that it’s interested in situations involving “a significant Federal tax issue”—i.e., not someone making a few hundred unreported dollars per year selling used underwear and butt selfies. As…Mistress Matisse put it: “Dudes, they want Donald Trump, they don’t want camgirls”…
Tracy Clark-Flory quotes me in Jezebel:
…How these trolls would know anything about the inner workings of any individual sex worker’s tax dealings is a mystery. But the boy geniuses behind this ploy are mighty impressed with themselves. The…dude who started it all recently posted to his Facebook page an image depicting himself as a warrior holding up the heads of three women’s faces overlaid with Snapchat filters…While many #ThotAudit-ers allege that they are, indeed, making formal reports to the IRS, there is no evidence to back up their claims. The IRS did not respond to Jezebel’s request for comment…Maggie McNeill…told Jezebel, “Several of us were as amused by this as we were disgusted.” Amused, she explained, because of “its impotence,” and disgusted “by its ugliness.” McNeill continued, “It’s just a new retread of the ‘criminal sluts’ male fantasy of sex work: that we’re all ‘loose women’ who are too lazy to do ‘real work’ and make a killing without paying taxes”…
…To report someone through the whistleblower program, you need a lot of their personal information: Physical address, full legal name, date of birth (or approximate age), and taxpayer identification number…You also have to have to have specific information about the type of fraud being alleged as well as how much money the person being reported has earned; it’s clear from the forms…that this is generally intended for people within companies to whistleblow about tax evasion that they have…document…[to] prove…You also have to physically mail all of this information to the IRS, because it does not accept any of this information by phone or email; one of the whistleblower programs specifically states that anyone submitting information does so under the threat of perjury…Christopher Kirk, attorney and master preparer at Safeword Tax Service…said….“Most sex workers tend not to earn enough to catch the notice of the IRS. With their limited staff resources, the IRS tends to go after larger operators”…
Anyhow, this whole 50-clown-car pile-up of buffoonery was to me summed up by last Monday’s revelation that David Wu, the dude who started it, has a history of trying to extort nude pictures from underage girls using threats of doxxing; the whole “thot audit” nonsense is exactly that sleazy practice, writ large, albeit less competently.
what a great post! I pay mine, and always have! Being creative in what I list as my occupation. 🙂
What’s next, that University of Seattle study that says that women retain the live DNA of all their sex partners, despite the fact that sperm can only live to three days at tops? (Truth be told, I am skeptical of that as I am skeptical of anything coming from Al Gore or the Center for Immigration Studies.)
Good job destroying that strawman. Every “incel” I’ve met would be thrilled if sex-for-pay were safely possible to obtain where he lived.
Bullshit. Thanks to the internet, sex for hire can be obtained safely in any moderately-sized city in the US, as long as the dude can control his dick for long enough to do the research instead of channeling Veruca Salt and insisting “I want it NOOOOOOW!!” Legally, no. Safely, yes.
This has been popular in the venues I frequent, and the idea that “e-thots” are leftwing supporters of tax increases gets floated as justification. I’ve been answering with this:
1) The IRS doesn’t just target whoever you point out to them. They target conservatives preferentially, as we famously saw in 2012-2013 when they were caught targeting Obama’s opposition.
2) Setting a fixed price and providing a product in return is what the IRS can punish. Gifts up to $15,000 are exempt. So no fixed price and no certain reward are what this encourages. If the girl encourages “gifts” and doesn’t always provide anything in return, she’s safe. So the “thottier” she is, the safer, and the whole “report to IRS” idea encourages an honest porn seller changing into an emotional manipulator for her own safety.
I’m sure the IRS has its ways of rejecting “gift” claims, probably just by requiring proof that it wasn’t not a gift, The IRS is kind of troll organization itself, technicalities only are defense if you are a corporation with a legal department
Point, And a reason an audit is a harm regardless of whether one pays one’s taxes or not.
I should mention that “incels” are not all like the nasty stereotype found in recent media, any more than prostitutes are all drug-addicted sleazes destined for an early grave. Many of us have tried repeatedly to have normal sexual relationships, only to be rejected and told “Why can’t we just be friends?” And after a long dry spell, you have noted yourself that men’s sex drives can take some strange, nasty turns.
I also should point out that not everybody lives in, or has easy regular access to, urban areas. And there are people for whom the risk of arrest and public exposure as a “john” would rule out seeking out prostitutes. Just not knowing the ropes is also a factor.
I know a bunch of incel guys who are nice enough and could really benefit from some time with a GFE escort, and would love it, but can’t afford it. Partly because of how much illegality pushes up the price, and maybe more because of how much social stigma pushes it up.
The idea that prices for GFE escorts would drop much under decriminalization is largely erroneous; escorts in NSW charge much the same. There is a price difference, but it’s mostly in the group of sex workers who provide more basic, less emotionally-intensive services, for reasons that should be obvious. There is no way I or anyone else could provide such intense interaction for a fraction of what we currently charge.
Yeah, I can see that. I was thinking in terms of less skilled and desirable people joining the market, rather than price drops for existing ones, but that might not make a really big difference. It’s sad for people who can’t afford it.
That’s not the way it works. Complainers are complainers; there are currently MUCH lower-priced providers available, so why don’t these guys take advantage of them NOW? It’s because they think they’re entitled to the women they assign higher “numbers” to. Guys who claim otherwise don’t see the kind of toxic emails & texts I get from these vulgar, entitled cheapskates.
[…] You can read her entire blog post HERE… […]
[…] You can read the entire blog post HERE… […]
So guys who get loads of sex are mostly paying for it? Because if so then I’ve been fed a load of porky pies!
Anyway, I think that a big reason for incels is this idea that to be a “real man” you have to have had loads of sex. While there’s some logic to it, if you’re a guy getting little sex and the loneliness and frustration with it, this idea is just kicking you when you’re down, and probably contributing in part to the incel phenomenon. Men who get little sex shouldn’t be ridiculed any more than women who have a lot of it, it’s all just ridiculous.