One of the bizarre contradictions of modern American society is that at a time when consent has been raised practically to the level of a fetish, complete with various sects of authoritarians declaring themselves the absolute arbiters on what constitutes “true” consent and what doesn’t, many of the same people who would absolutely have a cow if some private citizen slightly smudged a consent-line in some minor fashion have absolutely no issue with government operatives trampling all over consent in the most horrifying ways imaginable. The same politicians (and their lackeys and followers) who bloviate about “revenge porn“, align themselves with “Me Too” and posture performatively every time a non-cop accused of rape is found not guilty after a trial, suddenly lose their concern for individual consent when it’s government operatives violating it via spying, groping, assault, robbery, rape, abduction or even murder; when confronted with this contradiction they’ll nearly always vomit out nonsense about a “social contract”, as though consent were something which could be granted for individuals by some collective, possibly even a collective with no living members.
A large part of the problem is that while we see lots of explanations of consent like the one above, nobody dares to explain to kids that just because an adult has a costume on or is called an “authority” doesn’t give them the right to ignore your consent. Not even if they call it “punishment” or a “search”, or say you need it to get on an airplane or enter a building. People are always wringing their hands about how many cops, teachers, clergy, etc molest or even rape kids & teenagers, yet they never consider that the root cause of these violations is that they’ve drummed it into those kids’ heads that “authorities” must be obeyed and have various excuses to touch or hurt those kids without their consent, simply by giving the abuse some fancy name like “discipline”, “arrest” or, worst of all, the innocuous-sounding “search”. Nobody has the right to violate their consent, and they owe nobody unquestioned obedience. And until we start teaching that, we’re never going to see an end to the nauseating parade of “authorities” groping, molesting and raping society’s most vulnerable members while the adults who should be protecting them utter pious platitudes about “security”, “obedience”, and “law”.
Can see from the case of the college student expelled for rape though he was the one who was unconscious that the professional and amateur consent activists don’t really care about consent, it’s just a power-play.
Well said.
Interesting footnote to the cartoon: I can hug/kiss someone without consent if it’s for their safety/health? Imagine millions of kids and their grownups struggling to imagine a context in which that makes sense.
With regard to the fetishizing of consent, unfortunately it’s the not the sexy kind of fetish. Feminists demand it, women hate the results.
https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1181064088643887105
I couldn’t agree more with Dr. Degen. It kills me that various progressives and leftists still defend the joke that is Feminism.
On a blog chalk full of worthwhile reading, this entry will go down as one of the best.
I don’t think I’ve every seen consent spelled out so well. Our criminal system has gone so astray from the lessons of the Nuremberg trial, The Declaration of Helsinki and the Belmont report that established the concept that there could be no consent without the express consent of those directly involved. It’s refreshing to see the basic ethical framework of consent spelled out so succinctly.
It’s too bad policy is not based on reason. The world would lbe a much better place.