I think regular readers already understand my views on government, and I don’t believe anyone who has read more than a few scattered columns would be so foolish as to attempt to get me to do something by vomiting “It’s the law!” all over my mailbox. Alas, not everyone is a regular reader of this blog, and many who aren’t are such hopeless moral imbeciles that they truly believe some agreement made between fascists whom I neither know nor respect establishes some kind of “legitimate” authority over me that I’m bound to obey, even if it runs contrary to my own moral precepts. And so three times already this year I’ve been emailed by people requesting, arguing for or even demanding the censorship of their names from some news item on this blog, due to the European Union’s imaginary “right to be forgotten“. One of these individuals was such a complete arsehole, removing his name would’ve constituted collaboration with evil; one I had no opinion about, and the most recent I was actually sympathetic to. But when I cover a news story, I already make a decision whether the names should be shared or not, and “it’s the law” is, if anything, an argument against complying with a demand for censorship. But it’s more than just that; years ago in “A Look at the Works” I wrote…
…I take an extremely dim view of websites who shove posts down the memory hole just because some readers didn’t like them; I have the philosophy that “you can’t unring a bell”, so once a post is up I will not remove it no matter who finds it offensive. Besides the ethical problem that would create, removing the index entries and hyperlinks would be like pulling one gear out of a clock…and if you think I’m going to leave an ugly and conspicuous hole in a four-year-long perfect record just because it hurt your feelings, I respectfully suggest you reconsider your place in the universe…
Since then I’ve made exactly one exception to that rule (about which the less said, the better) at the request of a person I love very much, because for me loyalty trumps everything else. But if you aren’t such a person I suggest you reread the above block quote while remembering that “four-year-long perfect record” has since grown to ten, then ask yourself whether you really think I’ll make an exception for you because some especially-pompous politicians a third of the way around the planet ordered me to.
If people are going to shout “It’s the law” over trivialities, especially at someone like our gracious hostess who makes her contempt for that sort of argument widely known, then they could at least get the law *right*.
The so-called “right to be forgotten”, where it is actually enforceable at all, only gets you the ability to have articles about you removed from search-engine listings. Even the weaker protection of free speech we have on this side of the pond protects the original articles those listings linked to from being taken down unless they are actually (by EU standards) defamatory – and even then there would still be the SPEECH act to overcome if someone wanted to enforce such a ruling against Maggie.
While you may have only made that one actual deletion, those wonderful posts of personal stories you made in the early history of this blog (most with a first name as the title) have gone unmentioned and unrepeated since, and I felt they at least deserve praise.