The GSI…is not an index of global slavery, but rather of global hypocrisy. – Julia Davidson & Sam Okyere
A young U.S. citizen is suing the federal government after she said she was taken in handcuffs by border officers to a Nogales [Arizona] hospital for a body cavity search — which found nothing — and then billed for the procedure. Ashley Cervantes…crossed into Mexico on foot on a Saturday morning in October 2014 to have breakfast at a restaurant where she often eats. On returning, she presented border officials with her birth certificate and state identification card…they accused…[her] of possessing drugs…she was handcuffed to a chair, had several dogs sniff her, and eventually taken into a separate room where she was patted down and asked to squat so female investigators could visually inspect her. All…without her consent or a warrant…a request to call her mother was denied…Cervantes was taken in handcuffs to Holy Cross Hospital where the doctor probed her anus and vagina…No drugs ever were found…and…[she] was released after about seven hours…They even billed her parents for the “treatment” for $575…
A seven-hour rape, after which the rapists bill the victim for their “services”. But this isn’t a police state.
When will these cops learn? RAPING a whore is OK; it’s only paying her that’s an issue:
[Prison guard] Robert Moore, who…[was] arrested in December on what was at the time referred to as a “prostitution related crime,” was arrested yet again…for engaging/ soliciting for the purpose of prostitution…Moore…[was] “found…with the prostitute with her clothes partially off and a crack pipe in her pocket. The woman told police…she and Moore read the Bible and talked about having intercourse…Officers say they found a wrapper and condom; Moore told them he put a condom on, but never intended on having sex“…
For Those Who Think Legalization is a Good Idea
On 13 June, the Department of Telecommunications ordered internet service providers to block nearly 240 websites offering escort services. The diktat came out of the blue, without any attendant statement from the government…In July last year, the Centre had tried to ban 857 pornographic websites, ostensibly to protect our countrymen (and women) from “immoral” influences on the internet. That initiative came to nought, and the government backtracked, following a huge public and social media outcry against its attempt to police not just the internet, but also the private lives and sexual habits of citizens…However, the directive to black out…escort services shows that a year down the line, the government is unwavering in its resolve to censor the internet at will…in the interest of upholding its own ideas of public morality…when the state is in no position to ban prostitution – under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, buying and selling of sex is not illegal – why is it trying to take up cudgels against…escort services?…The government’s repeated attempts to police the internet and ferret out and ban its so-called corrupting elements are at once absurd and sinister…
This is a bit of a head-scratcher; I’m not sure how working for free could be considered a “protest”:
Sex Workers in South Africa decided to offer free services as a protest intended to force President Jacob Zuma to address the needs of young people in the Rainbow nation…the special service [ran] for 24 hours across the country [on June 16th] to mark South Africa’s Youth Days…
Definitely not a police state, no sirree:
The US Federal Bureau of Investigation has successfully convinced a federal judge to block the disclosure of where the bureau has attached surveillance cams on Seattle utility poles…this privacy dispute highlights a powerful and clandestine tool the authorities are employing across the country to snoop on the public—sometimes with warrants, sometimes without…The deployment of such video cameras appears to be widespread. What’s more, the Seattle authorities aren’t saying whether they have obtained court warrants to install the surveillance cams…
You know that “negative secondary effects” bullshit?
The sex industry…has long been perceived and regulated as a “dirty and disorderly” feature of residential communities. The stereotypical, and unfair, view of sex workers is that they are vectors of disease and social contagions; it’s a moral hangover from the Victorians…[which] is reflected in the regulation and marginalisation of sex work by…government policies to dark and secluded areas of cities…and police forces periodically engage in “clean-up” campaigns that seek to purge local areas of sex work…[these] strategies tend to be based not on science, but on a small number of complaints from a vocal minority who assert particular moral agendas. Such raids are generally justified by the media and local authorities on the basis that locals, especially women and children, need to be protected from the harmful effects of “sleaze”…Research by Phil Hubbard and colleagues, Penny Crofts, Sarah Kingston, and Emily Cooper…suggests that sex work contributes to residential communities in much more complex ways than is commonly portrayed in the media…
“Residential farm” = “doing menial agricultural labor for their keep”. But hey, at least they won’t be having dirtydirty sex:
For women escaping the sex trafficking industry, opportunities to start over new are slim, and places they can go to heal fully are even fewer. Such is the mission of Sacred Roots Farm, which aims to be “a place of holistic healing”…The nonprofit’s eventual aim is to build a residential farm for those women and their children. Founder Sam Haupt…began researching the issue and learned Atlanta is a known hub of trafficking and sex exploitation…
Cops openly admit being lazy fascists; the public just stays asleep:
California’s Costa Mesa Police Department arrested more people on prostitution-related charges in the first four months of 2016 than it did in all of the preceding five years…Police say this is thanks to a conscious decision to refocus a special investigations unit away from busting gang leaders, career criminals, and drug dealers and toward people involved in the sex trade…A long-term drug investigation could eat up hours of work from a half-dozen detectives…Arresting sex workers, however, is easy…But there may be an additional motive for the new focus: the city wants to get rid of several small motels and replace them with condo and apartment buildings. The hotels attract a lot of vice crimes…and policing them is a drain on public safety resources, city leaders complain. Rather than reconsidering the need to obsess over these activities in the first place, officials want the hotels to go away to make room for higher-end residential housing…more profitable in terms of taxes to the city…
The only parts of this that aren’t profoundly ignorant are the ones that are profoundly obvious:
Sex workers aren’t only found on the street corners of big cities…the first-ever…research survey in Ontario…has assessed the social and health needs of rural sex workers…Researcher Stacey Hannem said the…project began in 2014 when she was approached by a group of social and health service providers [whom]…sex workers didn’t feel comfortable [with because]…the…providers would often try to [coerce] sex workers [to] exit the industry, when that wasn’t…what they wanted…”There is less street-based work but more of this kind of mid-range, everyday escorting,” [Hannem] said…rural sex workers usually find their clients through online advertising, and it often involves much more travel than urban work…
I’ve got news for you, Stacey; mid-range everyday escorts who advertise online are the norm everywhere, so there aren’t dramatically more of them in rural areas than in cities. An added level of stupidity: look at the picture CBC chose to illustrate a story about how there are fewer street workers in country towns.
Massage parlors are popular targets of “anti-trafficking” pogroms because they’re low-hanging fruit:
…Between 2014 and 2015, 45 [Sacramento] businesses were cited for prostitution-related offenses, sexual battery and multiple violations of the county codes that govern massage establishments…Twenty-one…had their licenses revoked in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015—more than five times the previous year’s number…these operations…cause more harm than good. “I can’t tell you how many of these people may want another job, but taking away their job doesn’t do that,” said Kristen DiAngelo…political and legal responses are often sold as cracking down on exploitation and human trafficking…But, at least locally, authorities say there is no connection between illicit massage parlors and human trafficking….“This does not address abuse,” DiAngelo said. “It’s all a game. And it’s a political game”…
Held Together With Lies (#643)
How “Walk Free Foundation” comes up with those ridiculous “slavery” numbers:
Walk Free has just released its 2016 Global Slavery Index…announcing that there are 45.8 million slaves in the world today…Walk Free doesn’t claim that slavery only exists where people are held in shackles. Rather, it extends the concept to include people threatened with violence when attempting to leave a given situation or tied by debt to a particular employer. When it comes to children, Walk Free includes even those who are paid for their labour and who are not necessarily subject to violence or debt, but who are nonetheless counted as “slaves” simply because they are under the age of 18…if Walk Free…is willing to expand the concept of “slavery” in these ways, then why stop here Take “forced and early marriage”…consensual marriages also become violent and oppressive. Furthermore, because women often lack legal or financial access to divorce, and/or face stigma and penury as divorced women or single mothers, the many millions who suffer domestic violence are frequently unable to “walk away” from their abusive husbands. So why don’t these wives also appear as “slaves” in Walk Free’s index? Equally, we might ask, if it is the absence of consent to a lifelong relationship rather than the actual presence of violence in that relationship that makes “forced and early marriage” a proxy for slavery, then why isn’t the “forced and early motherhood” experienced by women and girls in countries which restrict or deny access to abortion also “modern slavery”?…
A bipartisan group of legislators and advocacy groups are asking Gov. Mary Fallin to order a stop to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol’s use of mobile scanners capable of [stealing] money loaded onto prepaid debit cards…Deployment of the scanners comes at a time when civil asset forfeiture has come under criticism in Oklahoma…
The governor has complied with the request, but only until they can put the public back to sleep:
…She says she wants to suspend use of the devices until a clear policy for using the new technology can be developed by the Department of Public Safety. She says taking the time will help educate the public and “calm the fears of the motoring public”…
It’s so nice when bogus “sex trafficking” bullshit is called out in the mainstream media:
…The [Indiana] task force…launched its effort with billboards emblazoned with the key statistical warning — “13 is the average age kids are first used in the sex trade”…But even child advocates say it’s not true. It’s cooked up data. In fact, it’s been debunked for several years…The Fact Checker at the Washington Post…gave this “fact” a pants-on-fire special trophy…The statistic was based on “pretty slim research” and makes little sense, [Glenn] Kessler wrote. If 13 is the average age for entering the sex trade, then there have to be children under age 11 offsetting those becoming sex workers at age 16 or 17. A 2008 study of sexually exploited kids in New York City found the average entry age is about 15, but the researchers warned that even that data is fuzzy, too…
When I pointed out to Glenn that these people were still misinterpreting the average age of debut for underage workers as the average for all workers, he flew into action and added an extra note to his re-debunking. Because that’s the kind of thing people who actually care about facts do!
Hey there Maggie, Â I just added a new topic for conversation in the ThaiVisa internet forum, a very busy website here in Thailand. Â Maybe there is a story or two or three for you in this over the months to come. Â It reads this way: Â In ThaiVisa Forum/ General Topics: Â ————————————————————————- I am beginning academic-style research into violence against sex workers. Â This is likely to grow into a Master or PhD thesis. Â Â Â For background only, what do you know about violence against sex workers? Â Â Â This is becoming an important issue. Â Thanks to the expose’ of Somaly Mam (Newsweek, May, 21, 2014) we know that anecdotal stories and huge numbers are important to justify and fund “rescue” NGOs. Â Maybe the need for rescue NGOs and their use of funds should be reconsidered – either increased or decreased – as a result of better understanding of violence sex workers face. Â Â Â Â Now there is a study making the rounds claiming 15% of all Thai prostitutes experience violence weekly. Â (The Nation, May 28, 2016) Â Yes, at that rate 105% of all Thai sex workers can be assumed to be subject to violence every 7 weeks. Â Does this sound about right to you? Â What are your qualifications to have an opinion? Â Â Comments from the Thai farang community will be helpful for background. Â Thanks – -Â In the last 17 minutes there have been 27 readers and so far no comments. Â I will share any new information later. Â So, what do you think of research that claims that 15% of sex workers suffer violence in one week? Â And this is coming from academic-style, peer reviewed, co-authored (Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and Penn State Depts of Public Health) and originated with Mahidol University, the second best in Thailand. Â Claims of 15% violence every week could easily go viral and become the new gold standard of oppressive paradigm exaggeration. Â Â Attached is the original Mahidol study in 2007. Â The only question that has anything to do about violence is Q804 on page 96. Â This one question was used by the Harvard group to break out two groups – one that experienced violence and the other that did not, and with that shaky method compared their sexual health. Â Here is the Harvard / Johns Hopkins study that helps spread this crazy idea of 15% experiencing violence in only one week: Â http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20444745Â This is the Harvard study! Also attached is the The Nation (a Thai English language paper) article that helped spread the idea that 15% in one week is somehow normal or honest data. Â When you see stories in the future about huge amounts of violence suffered by sex workers this is likely to be a major source of the “proof”.
FROM:Â Â John Kane 66 (0)84-558-4788 Prasanmit CondominiumSukhumvit Soi 23Wattana, Bangkok 10110
Not sure if your Bangkok correspondent is concern-trolling or not. The inquiry about “qualifications” is a bit of an eyebrow-raiser.
“Now there is a study making the rounds claiming 15% of all Thai prostitutes experience violence weekly. Yes, at that rate 105% of all Thai sex workers can be assumed to be subject to violence every 7 weeks.”
John, a person who is attempting to write a master’s thesis ought not be so bad at math. This is like saying “they say the chance of flipping heads on a coin is 50/50, but this means you have a 150% chance of getting heads after three flips, so clearly this statistic is nonsense”. It’s nice to have allies, but not ones that make such silly arguments.
The better place to go is first, to what exactly this “violence” comprises. Are they including being assaulted by cops? If violence is a problem, the the solution is legalisation (or decriminalisation, – I’m still not sure which is which).
“I’m not sure how working for free could be considered a “protest”:”
Because it exposes the hypocrisy of making sex illegal when it is paid for. After all, the protesting prostitutes were doing exactly the same thing during the protest as they do usually. And yet it wasn’t illegal. Why not? If it’s legal to do it for free, why should it be illegal to do it for payment? None of the usual arguments – public health, “good of society”, sex rays – had changed. That is, any of these arguments should they apply to these protesting prostitutes would also apply to regular people having sex without a license from the government (a marriage license, in fact) to do so.
Of course, there are counterarguments: that there’s a difference between committing a single act of theft and of supporting yourself by means of thievery; or between a brief period of unemployment and being a lifelong welfare leech. That living on income gotten from prostitution, that *being a prostitute*, has something more to it than simply the individual instances of exchanging money for sex. (Of course, one must still establish that being a prostitute, or having a society with prostitutes in it, is a bad thing)
But these counterarguments are tricky to fit onto a bumper sticker.
Maggie, have you commented yet on that San Diego report of $800 million annually made off sex trafficking?
I’m guessing this is another case where simply that huge number for one city puts this into question. As if there’s no consensual sex work at all in San Diego.
There’s little to comment on; it’s a total absurdity by statistical morons. Mike Crawford read it and apparently it’s bad even by prohibitionist standards.
From John to Paul: I have no math issues. For brevity I did not go into detail to explain that the methodology described would imply that a number equal to all sex workers in Thailand are at risk of violence every seven weeks, but of course some are magnets for abuse and some, with aptitude, avoid violence. There is enough here to show that the World Bank, the sponsoring university and others should only need to apply common sense to see that this is data is seriously wrong! This research I am challenging dates back to 2007. I will be pleased to share with you. If you know more about this issue, that has been on my mind for several years, our collaboration might be useful.
This is not the first time I have felt unwelcome here. Please be aware I am a 70 year old retiree from the US Dept of State who has experienced sex work in the Dominican Republic, Madagascar, Albania, Thailand, Philippines, and, as recently as last week, Laos.
But I guess my contribution is not welcome except with Paul Murray’s criticism.
And what the hell is “concern-trolling” supposed to be? When the research is published I will bring it to Maggie’s attention. Otherwise I will read this blog without comment.