What if a different attitude about pornography were the “alternative to pornography”? – Tina Horn
I suspect they have the right guy this time:
King County prosecutors have charged a 31-year-old Kent man with three counts of rape, and Seattle police continue to investigate…in connection with five more sexual assaults, all involving women working as prostitutes on Aurora Avenue North. Brandon Cole Reed was arrested…one day after prosecutors dismissed a second-degree-rape charge against…Andrew Tatum, who was arrested in February…[for] the rapes Reed is now suspected of committing…Reed “picks up prostitutes on Aurora Avenue, drives to a nearby location, and then rapes them, by brandishing a knife, threatening to hurt or kill them, handcuffing them or brandishing mace,” Senior Deputy Prosecutor Carla Carlstrom wrote…Reed was 11 and his brother was 12 in 1995 when they dragged a 12-year-old girl into their house…and took turns raping her…[they] were found guilty of second-degree rape…and sentenced to 21 to 28 weeks in juvenile detention…Both were required to register as sex offenders for 15 years…Reed was also convicted in 2009 of second-degree malicious mischief for throwing rocks and damaging his ex-girlfriend’s car after she refused to get back together with him…
This interactive map characterizes countries according to 11 different legal approaches to laws regarding prostitution, and 9 different legal characteristics, for the most complex and accurate analysis of the subject yet. Please bookmark!
The Canadian Women’s Foundation says…the average age for new recruits was 13…A 14-year-old at the centre of a human trafficking case is among the youngest girls allegedly forced into prostitution…in decades…Staff Sgt. Darrell Gaudet said…such cases are rare…in…more than 20 years, Gaudet said he has dealt with four cases of 14-year-olds…[and one] 13…
Is this idiotic enough yet? Can we stop now?
Police arrested a Longwood, Florida, 12-year-old girl for pinching a male classmate’s butt…Breana Evans has been charged with misdemeanor battery and was temporarily placed in juvenile detention. Everybody involved…thinks the arrest is an overreaction…except the boy’s mom, who alerted police and demanded that they prosecute…police [pretend] that…they had no choice but to arrest Breana…[who] will have to complete community service, submit to drug tests, and [endure indoctrination sessions]. If she does all those things, the charges will eventually be dismissed…
Pity the poor “authorities”, who had “no choice”. Because “prosecutorial discretion” is only for cops who rape or murder people, not for kids being kids.
Potty obsession is rotting politicians’ brains:
Fayetteville [Arkansas] councilman John La Tour is being accused of confronting a woman he assumed was transgender and threatening to wave his penis at her at a crowded restaurant…After the incident, a manager apparently asked La Tour to leave [the] restaurant…According to a Facebook post by…Gavin Smith: “la tour [sic]…[demanded my friend] pick a gender declaiming loudly that he couldn’t tell if she was a man or a woman. She is not transgendered and does not in any way present any ambiguity about gender in any way. She’s a woman. He then explained that he was a man and could prove it by dropping his pants and showing his penis”…La Tour subsequently [pretended] he’d merely asked the woman — who is employed at the restaurant — to dance…
Probably a longer sentence than he would’ve received in the US:
Derren Tomlinson, 44, with the West Mercia Police department was sentenced to 11 years in prison this week for…raping a girl under 13-years-old, sexual assault on a child, and bestiality. His offensively short sentence is likely due to the fact that he was a [cop]…The department found out…after looking through his phone which revealed a number of photos showing him raping a child…[and] engaging in sexual intercourse with a dog…
Steinem’s been peddling this malarkey since 1978, and I’ve been mocking it since at least 1984:
…one of the most vocal proponents of [the] damaging dichotomy [between “bad porn” and “good erotica”] is feminist icon Gloria Steinem. And every time I hear her or someone else trot out this tired trope, I recoil—because it is indicative of our culture’s persistent stigmatization of sex work, classist attitudes about sexual morality, and suppression of healthy sexual expression. It’s a dichotomy that demands to be not only challenged, but dismantled…Steinem has been repeating some version of this baseless definition game since 1978, when she published the Ms. magazine article, “Erotica and pornography: Do You Know the Difference?” The answer to this question is: No, we don’t, Gloria, because neither you nor anyone else has ever managed to provide a useful or convincing distinction…
And how does the judge plan to “keep” these “children” in the “safe house” to endure “therapy”? Oh, yeah:
There are more than 3,000 minors in [Nevada’s] juvenile justice system, and many are victims of human trafficking. “For…10 years, I’ve been advocating…for a safe house for our sexually exploited youth,” said Judge William Voy…”We have to identify better which kids really need to be locked up…with the kids who don’t”…the state needs a therapeutic…secured facility to keep these children. He said if the state doesn’t get this kind of facility it risks losing the kids to the streets all over again…
This article could’ve been so much better; it quotes a number of sex workers, including my close friend Savannah Sly and my acquaintances Chelsea Lane & Jill Brenneman. It presents some pretty good arguments, and talks about Amnesty’s research. But it also quotes prohibitionists, repeats bad data, confuses legalization and decriminalization, does not discuss the failure of the Swedish model, and sets up a false equivalence between those who want to be free to make their own choices and those who want to control others’ choices with state violence (as though they were two equal sides in an academic “debate”). It’s also mind-numbingly boring; I sincerely doubt anyone will read the whole thing. I know I couldn’t.
Whores in the so-called “developing world” are so much better at activism than those of us in the US:
…Gabriela Leite and Lourdes Barreto founded the Brazilian Network of Prostitutes (BNP) in the mid 1980s in response to police violence in the red light districts where they worked…The BNP earned seats at the policy-making table and was fundamental in developing peer-led HIV prevention initiatives. Their partnership with the country’s National AIDS Programme gained international attention in 2005 when Brazil refused more than $40 million in US funds because USAID…demanded that organisations receiving funds condemn prostitution…[Prohibitionism] gained strength in Brazil at the start of the new millennium, fuelled by moral panic and by the growth of carceral feminism…and Christian conservatism…The prostitutes’ movement has responded with a two-prong strategy: on the one hand, it is engaging in street politics, guerrilla theatre, and practical initiatives; on the other, it is entering the forums and institutions that sprung up around human trafficking…
A lot of people are going to be really unhappy about this:
The chorus outside Old City Hall hit its peak once a judge acquitted former CBC Radio host Jian Ghomeshi on all charges of sexual assault and choking, the outraged shouts of “I believe survivors” reverberating off the courthouse steps and in more than 10,000 posts online…Ontario Court of Justice Judge William Horkins said he simply could not trust the three complainants, given their shifting memories and evidence that at times strayed into outright lies…he said the 5,000 messages exchanged between actress Lucy DeCoutere and another complainant sounded like they could be plotting to ruin the former broadcaster… “Ms. DeCoutere and S.D. considered themselves to be a ‘team’ and the goal was to bring down Mr. Ghomeshi”…As Crown prosecutor Michael Callaghan stood in front of a stand of microphones giving reporters his reaction, a topless female protester jumped in front of him, yelling “Ghomeshi guilty!” knocking over the stand. Police tackled the woman to the ground and took her back inside the courthouse as she struggled and kicked the door. She was handcuffed by police and led into the back of a police cruiser…
As a woman who’s endured several rapes myself, I understand the anger. But what do the protesters actually want, for the state to be able to convict people on shoddy evidence? I simply can’t side with people who believe that locking up as many people as possible to prevent some bad guys getting away with crimes is a good idea. The carceral state is a far greater threat than any one rapist, or even than all unconvicted rapists put together.
Anyone who understands the dynamics of group psychology should already have known this:
You would think securing a conviction against a suspected criminal would have to be helped if all the witnesses…independently identify the same culprit. But new…research suggests that unanimity of witnesses should trigger a warning that perhaps police have the wrong person…the probability of a large number of people all agreeing in [difficult observation] circumstances [is] small…the error rate among [crime] witnesses…[is] around 47 per cent. “So if…20 people all agree it is the same guy you should be now more suspicious of their agreement,” [lead researcher Professor Derek Abbott] said. Their modelling showed even with just a 1 per cent error rate, confidence in a police line-up result would decrease after three unanimous identifications…
If you don’t understand this, please take the time to read my paper, “Mind-witness Testimony“.
[US deportation agent] Keith Owens…[was featured in a] television series, Web of Lies…The episode [inanely] titled “Stolen Youth”…aired on March 2…being involved in this documentary is in line with his commitment to combating human trafficking…“This film will definitely wake the public up in regards to human trafficking that should be named modern-day slavery,” Owens said. “These predators take possession of [their victims], and force and coerce people to do things they don’t want to do”…
You mean, like cops and other government agents do? Or do you mean a different kind of taking possession of people and forcing & coercing them to do things they don’t want to do?
“But what do the protesters actually want, for the state to be able to convict people on shoddy evidence?”
Because it involves sex (and privilege), yes, that’s exactly what they want.
Even more depressingly, that’s exactly what they’re going to get because as you note elsewhere, people in the “developing world” who have never known true security and freedom are going to plan better, and fight much harder and longer, than those of us in the West for what’s right because they have nothing left to lose but their lives.
This line-up had an unanimous result:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cd9zrBeUYAAEOF-.jpg:large
Have a happy Easter.
The interactive map you linked to: It gives the same information for Great Britain, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland – and all under ‘United Kingdom’. There’s no mention of the criminalisation of the buyer in N Ireland; this may become the position in the Republic.
He Said, She Said:
And what about men being locked up while being innocent? Not a factor worth your consideration?
Who is this addressed to? Did you somehow miss my years of commentary on this subject? Or just these lines:
It was addressed to you, obviously. And no, I did not miss your writings, I was making sure your stance has not changed because I did have some doubts about that. Thanks for clearing this up.
Why would you have doubts? There is nothing in the item to indicate as much, and a lot to indicate otherwise.
The article you link to on Derren Tomlinson is plain wrong. Tomlinson was additional punished because he was Police Community Support Officer (not a police officer) with West Mercia Police. According to the guidelines which judges are obliged to follow, the starting point for rape of a victim under 13 years of age would be 10 years with a range of 8 – 13 years. However, this is increased to 13 years with a range of 11 – 17 years where there is an abuse of trust, as there was in this case because Tomlinson was a PCSO.
The intercourse with an animal carries a maximum 2 year sentence on indictment and 6 months on summary conviction. He was convicted on indictment but the offence should have run currently. Also because Tomlinson plead guilty at the earliest opportunity, he earned an automatic 1/3 discount to his sentence. Therefore his sentence of 11 years 4 months indicates a starting point of 17 years, which is at the top end of the scale.
Moreover he was also given an extended sentence of 4 months, which potentially doubles his sentence. In the UK, prisoners are automatically released at the half way point of their sentence and serve the remainder on license (parole). Whereas if a prisoner is given an extended sentence because they are considered especially dangerous, they are only eligible for release at the 2/3 point of their sentence and even then face a parole hearing. Consequently they can serve their full sentence plus the extension (in this case an additional 4 months) on licence.
This sentence is the maximum the judge could conceivable give without being overturned on appeal.
It’s a classic “first they came for the socialists” situation. The feminists and sex-hysterics think the carceral state is a great idea, because they imagine that it’s only men that will be locked up. Then the cops start putting pubescent girls into juvie, and it’s “Oops, didn’t think of that!” time.
The thing about Ghomeshi, is that long before the trial all the media were already lynching him. Now that the credibility of the accuser has been destroyed in court it seems the media is trying to save face by shifting the blame to the police, the Crown, the judge, The System; or anyone except the lying accusers. You have legal ‘experts’ complaining that the expectations for sex assault accusers are too high. Yeah, like expecting a woman to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is unrealistic.
It’s not unusual to have people get caugt lying and wiggle out of it. Politician do it all the time and we still elect them. But the amount of media hysteria in support of these women is astonishing. Fortunately most of the comments from the public are very critical.
Some good insight, in my opinion, on the Ghomeshi case (and the female mentality that produces so many false accusations of rape) here.