Tyrants never fight harder than when they know they’re losing, in order to destroy the lives of as many of their chosen victims as possible while they still can. – “NYE 2020“
It has been ten years since I first predicted how “sex trafficking” mythology would implode…
…and though I was correct in general I underestimated how hard the government and fascist profiteers would work to extend it, resulting in my prediction being too optimistic by about three or four years. Government funding for anti-sex hate groups is still flowing like a river of toxic vomit despite most people having found a new topic to panic about, but the “true believers” have expanded the core myth cycle to include even more bizarre elements (including techno-vampirism and colonies on Mars) that apparently are too much for the same outlets that breathlessly parroted wild sexual fantasies about millions of pubescent girls chained to radiators while being raped 100 times a day…
A few years ago, a few journalists whose critical faculties had not entirely atrophied due to disuse began to realize just how disgusting and morally-repellent the copaganda and torture porn they had served up to their readers actually was, and began casting about for some means of distancing themselves and their outlets from it; ironically, the solution was provided by their favorite target of scorn, Donald Trump, or rather his deranged worshipers. Some outlets (including the paper that launched the panic in 2004), relied upon the American public’s infantile attention span to avoid backsplash, boldly debunking their own lies while pretending that the newest version of their favorite clickbait fantasy was something new and uniquely Trumpian. This recent and much-ballyhooed article from The Atlantic is a perfect example; it largely pretends that “sex trafficking” hysteria started in 2017 (safely within Trump’s term of office), even going so far as to state, “the last moral panic centered on widespread physical dangers to America’s children began in the early 1980s…“, as though there were a wide, clear gap between the Satanic Panic and “sex trafficking” hysteria (which there isn’t). The only exception the author mentions is Operation Underground Railroad, whose formerly-sterling reputation with US media has been degenerating for years due to the bizarre antics of its founder, and which conveniently embraced QAnon two years ago.
And then there’s the Washington Post, which despite featuring this debunking by yours truly eight years ago (thanks to longtime foe of tyranny Radley Balko), has been happy to spread mathematically-illiterate fantasies with all the others; in this recent article, it represents the specific “Wayfair” craziness as an isolated urban legend tied only to OUR, “Pizzagate” and QAnon, when in actuality it’s no different from the other hysterical nonsense I’ve chronicled in “The Widening Gyre” for ten years. And then there’s this George Will column, also in the Post, which condemns the depredations committed by police using one high-profile case of “a nonexistent Somali immigrant crime ring” while coyly avoiding mention of the fact that the imaginary “crime” was “sex trafficking”, a fantasy Will himself embraced.
Look, I’m happy to see this moral panic imploding, as I predicted it would a decade ago. Government and corporate funding for anti-sex worker hate groups isn’t drying up yet, but funding from individuals has already decreased enough that they’ve switched tactics to focus much more on porn, and supporting decriminalization is no longer politically radioactive in the US, the country driving the hysteria. But if you think I’m going to let the people who aided and abetted the most violent and widespread campaign of persecution against sex workers in American history get away with pretending they were on the side of truth all along, you must not have read very much of my work.
Hi Maggie, I’d like to ask you a big favor. There is a 500 page book advocating for a porn ban that came out in 2020 published by a Swede named Max Walman, a social justice warrior friend of Catharine MacKinnon. I have not been able to read the entire book, just by reading a piece and I noticed that it is full of lies, pseudo-arguments, faulty studies on the effects it causes as rapes.
I already know that these types of books are ubiquitous in feminist literature. But this worries me more because it tries to promote a legal way to achieve its prohibition. Although I admit that I am not deceived because I have studied a lot about pornography and prostitution. I think the book is capable of manipulating and confusing many people. That is why I think you should address some chapters of his book on your website.
https://books.google.com.cu/books?id=YHs_EAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Pornography+The+politics+of+legal+challenges&hl=es-419&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Pornography%20The%20politics% 20of% 20legal% 20challenges & f = false
I’ve actually explained before why I don’t “debate” prohibitionists; the short version is, it lends them credibility. It’s the same reason you won’t see many geologists “debating” creationism, or NASA people “debating” those who claim the moon landing was a hoax. When claims are so wild as to constitute pure fantasy, only those without critical thinking abilities believe them. And such folks are unlikely to be convinced otherwise by rational argument. Expressed even more simply, “It is impossible to reason someone out of a belief he didn’t reason himself into.”
“And such folks are unlikely to be convinced otherwise by rational argument. Expressed even more simply, “It is impossible to reason someone out of a belief he didn’t reason himself into.”
especially when its literally their job to convince others of the opposite, aka spread propaganda and sell their opinions. At that point its not important if they are true believers or just in it for the money, the result is the same.