Last week was…intense. Unfortunately, at the risk of being repetitive, I really can’t tell you about most of that due to issues of confidentiality. What I can tell you is that I had a lovely dinner with the young escort I mentioned last week, and I think we’re going to be very good friends; I invited her to relax with me on Saturday night, which turned out very well because we both needed it. And yes, gentlemen, we will see you as a duo if you like! Speaking of duos, I’m looking forward to another one this coming Saturday with the lovely and brilliant Lorelei Rivers, whom I always enjoy working with. And in just a few weeks, I’ll be in New York City; as of right now I’ll be available for bookings on Thursday, September 15th, Saturday the 17th and Sunday the 18th, but obviously that will change as my schedule fills up, so if you’d like to see me it’s best to book right away (and ask about my tour special). Speaking of being booked up, I’ve recently tried a new method of advertising which I’m very pleased with so far; if it keeps being this productive, I will finally be able to complete some improvements to my ranch that have been in limbo for years. And that, dear readers, will buy me a considerable amount of satisfaction.
Archive for 2016
Diary #321
Posted in Call types, Diary, tagged advertising, blogging, ethics, New York on August 23, 2016| Leave a Comment »
Negative Secondary Effects
Posted in Miscellaneous, Perception, Tyranny, tagged blogging, brothels, dirty, First They Came for the Hookers, Negative Secondary Effects, red-light districts, sex rays, stripping, What a Week! on August 22, 2016| 5 Comments »
Sometimes, the most difficult part of doing my news columns is deciding what subtitle to use for a given article. To be sure, many of them are obvious, but that’s not always the case; sometimes I remember a previous story I want to link back to, but for the life of me can’t remember what heading that one was under. And even if I can remember a few details of the original to search on, that doesn’t always help; for example, a few months ago I was trying to refer back to an article on strip club restrictions, but searching for “stripper”, “strip club” and even just “strip” wouldn’t find it. When I finally located it after half an hour of digging, I discovered the reason: the original article had used the phrase “exotic dancers”. Another thing that can make a heading tough to remember is topical drift; new stories refer back to older stories, then newer stories refer back to the update and so on, and after a while the heading doesn’t actually apply very well to what’s appearing under it. Sometimes I start using a new title for a certain kind of article, after a new full column on the subject appears (such as the recent shift from filing rapist cops under “Above the Law” to filing them under “To Molest and Rape“), and once in a while I even intentionally change the focus of a heading in order to collect stories on one theme which previously appeared under different headings (as I did two years ago with “Rooted in Racism“).
However, I think this may be the first time that I’ve ever written a new column expressly for the purpose of creating such a new heading. I’ve recently run into several stories about the effects of sex businesses on neighborhoods, and every fucking time I have forgotten which title the last one ran under. So then I’ve had to go through the pain of finding the last such article, but can’t remember the phrasing it used so the process takes forever. Well, no more; from now on such articles will appear under this heading. Previously, such articles have appeared under the not-terribly-intuitive title “What a Week!“, due to the aforementioned topical drift: the original of that name was an early news column which featured a story about a mega-brothel being built in Spain, then a couple of later ones referred back to it for a mega-brothel being built in Sydney, then another discussed a study done for the licensing of said brothel which demonstrated that the concept of “negative secondary effects” is essentially bullshit. And obviously, subsequent stories referred back to that. “Negative secondary effects” is the term used by prudes and authoritarians to make the concept of “sex rays” seem something other than ludicrous; this disproven dogma claims that the very existence of an adult business magically draws crime, and turns men into drooling sex maniacs who then go forth and rape women (hence the pious charade of directing a portion of “pole taxes” to finance rape and domestic violence charities or anti-whore programs). As a quick perusal of that last cluster of links will demonstrate, stories about claims of such effects mysteriously and malefically emanating from strip clubs rather than brothels or massage parlors have until now appeared under “First They Came for the Hookers” along with stories about former sex workers being fired from post-sex work jobs for having been sex workers. From here on out, any articles either claiming the existence of such baleful effects or debunking such claims will appear under this heading, whether that business is a strip club, brothel, adult toy store or whatever. So maybe now I won’t be quite so frustrated the next time I encounter such a story.
Links #320
Posted in Current Events, History, Links, Miscellaneous, Music, Tyranny, tagged Arizona, Australia, Central Asia, cops, drugs, hysteria, Illinois, Ohio, Sweden, universal criminality, video on August 21, 2016| 6 Comments »
The fact that you’ve got pinpoint eyes and you’re looking directly into the sun and they’re not dilating due to the sunlight, I believe you to be under the influence of a dangerous drug. – “Constable” Richard Power
A while back several of us on Twitter were discussing videos we found sexy, and I was hard-pressed to think of any except this one, which I found incredibly sexy at the time. And that’s your periodic peek at the deep weirdness of my psychosexual landscape. The links above it were provided by Mistress Matisse (“does” and “universal”), Emma Evans (“protect” and “protect”), Walter Olson (“cities”), Cathy Reisenwitz (“young”), Radley Balko (“maps”), and Elizabeth N. Brown (“Sweden” and “epidemic”).
- As one does.
- To protect and serve.
- Universal criminality in action.
- One of the world’s greatest lost cities.
- But we need government to PROTECT us!
- Libertarianism even happens to the very young.
- Another way flat maps distort our geographic perceptions.
- Ever notice headlines of the week tend to be from Florida or Sweden?
- Anything used to justify prohibition is always “increasing” and “epidemic”.
From the Archives
- Anne Elizabeth Moore discusses the deep connections between the “rescue” & garment industries.
- Does the magical “ownership”-changing force proceed from the eye of the whore or the “pimp”?
- Destroying families is OK if you pray for them & invoke nebulosities like “the good of society”.
- FDA approves dangerous psychotropic drug to “treat” a normal variation in female sex drive.
- She won’t tolerate ordinary men looking at women, but she’s fine with cops raping them.
- The law is unconstitutionally vague, but that would be politically unpopular.
- For those who forgot why Backage started taking payment in the 1st place.
- I’m pleased to see how hard Hollywood’s prohibitionism is backfiring lately.
- These stupid tropes just won’t die no matter how many times we kill them.
- Liz Brown on the “Would you want your daughter to be a whore?” fallacy.
- The bad consequences of US “anti-trafficking” policy aren’t unintentional.
- AZ & WA vie for the title of most prolific font of “sex trafficking” rhetoric.
- Prohibitionist fossils prefer lies, pearl-clutching to facts, self-ownership.
- Because there aren’t enough people on the “sex offender” registry yet.
- Mistress Matisse gives both barrels to prohibitionist Seattle politicians.
- A “sex trafficking ring”. On an island. With less than 100,000 people.
- “Sex trafficking” laws are intentionally designed to harm sex workers.
- Since no charity will take sex-rayed money, Rentboy created its own.
- Try not to vomit from the name cops gave their entrapment scheme.
- The proposed new law to “protect” German sex workers is very bad.
- Pop sonnets, cops, Don Pardo, perspective, hobbies, shame & more.
- I suspected the Amnesty position would embolden a few politicians.
- But officials claim “sex offender” registration isn’t a punishment.
- “Human trafficking” is now just a dysphemism for “prostitution”.
- “Sex trafficking” cinema represents pure fantasy as faux reality.
- Client gets angry when he recognizes that his whore is a whore.
- Cop helpfully explains that women are stupid, passive victims.
- Police violence against sex workers is just business as usual.
- Of course they were dropped; she was jut a whore, after all.
- The Economist on why decriminalization is a good idea.
- Is the Swansea sports team called the Pearl Clutchers?
- Is there any behavior in Ireland that isn’t “trafficking”?
- Cops, corpses, monsters, Yvonne Craig & much more.
- Jae’s accident and the answers to questions about it.
- There’s an awful lot of “suppose” and “maybe” here.
- New York’s “physical culture establishment permit”.
- A short biography of a cross-dressing courtesan.
- We’re seeing this sort of thing more and more.
- Tara Burns investigates the Amber Batts case.
- My visits to Philadelphia and Washington, DC.
- They just won’t give up their sex doll fantasy.
- Texas just loves the “Facebook pimps” myth.
- In which a cunning predator stalks her prey.
- Somehow, I doubt he thought this through.
- Rapist cops of the week, 2014 and 2015.
- Is there anything that isn’t “trafficking”?
- Can you help me with phone screening?
- A video on the myth of “sex trafficking”.
- The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
- What’s wrong with Pamela Stubbart?
- In for a penny, in for a pound.
- For their own good, of course.
- Podcasts I did in August 2014.
- Tits are an “offense to God”.
Writer’s Block
Posted in Diary, Fiction, Miscellaneous, tagged imaginative fiction, Ladies of the Night, The Forms of Things Unknown on August 19, 2016| 8 Comments »
Five years ago, in the introduction to “Concubine“, I wrote:
I must admit that I’m surprised I’ve been able to deliver [a new story] every month; I always used to say that unlike my dependable and constant Muse of Nonfiction, my Muse of Fiction was like a sulky girlfriend: when she wanted me she demanded my undivided attention, but when she didn’t want me I couldn’t even get her on the phone. But ever since “The Trick”, she has visited me without fail at least once per month, usually without my even having to beg her…
I repeated the joke in the foreword to Ladies of the Night, and until last year it was true. But as my available time shrank and my commitments increased, I found that inspiration often came more slowly, and I had to beg a lot more often. Fewer of my stories were (in my own opinion) really inspired or especially memorable, and the ones that were revealed a lot more of my soul than was the norm before. Several of the stories came to me literally hours before publication, then this past February I cheated by letting someone else tell a story, and last month I quietly and unceremoniously slipped another type of essay into the usual story slot. But if I keep doing that y’all are going to notice, so here we are. Some ideas were bouncing around my brain, but as of this writing none of them has gelled and I’m very tired and about to go and get myself a milkshake. So what I’m thinking is, I’m going to take a brief hiatus from fiction; the next story I think of will be an exclusive for my new book, The Forms of Things Unknown, which I plan to start compiling this coming week. I know this kind of sucks, but consider that I’ve had an almost unbroken run of one story per month for six years; that’s 72 stories in all. That’s really very damned good; I don’t think many writers are that prolific. I also don’t think my Muse has really returned to her old sulky ways; she’s probably just tired and wants a little vacation. Or maybe she’s suffering from PMS, or thinks I’ve been neglecting her. Maybe this is her way of getting me to do the book. But one way or another, I’m sure she’ll be sending me inspiration again in short order, and I’ll soon be serving up new tales on a regular basis again. And if not, it was a good thing while it lasted!
Age Before Beauty
Posted in Call types, Perception, Q & A, tagged bad customers, ethics on August 18, 2016| 3 Comments »
I’m thinking about calling an escort for the first time; do they take young guys seriously? Or would I be treated differently from older men?
Some ladies have a lower age limit of 30 or even 35, but if one does it’ll be marked clearly on her website. If a young man wants to see an escort, there are some very simple steps he can take to ensure she takes him seriously:
- Read her website carefully and approach her exactly as she says she wants to be approached. If you don’t have references, you need to find a lady who specifically advertises as “newbie friendly” or else you’re just wasting her time and yours.
- Be clear, honest and polite about being young, and understand that this is a liability for you rather than an asset; one of the most asinine and annoying things a would-be client can say is something like “I’m young and good looking, so you’ll enjoy it” or “Do I get a discount because I’m young and fit?”
- Don’t ask prying or lurid questions, and don’t try to get dirty talk for free; be polite and respectful.
- Be patient if she expects you to jump through some hoops; give her whatever screening info she wants.
- Read my “Advice for Clients” column and follow it.
- If she won’t see you, tell her you understand, thank her for her time & try another lady.
- If she does agree to see you, make sure you’re on your best behavior and tip her extra; the next time you want to see someone you’ll be able to give the first lady’s name as a reference, and she will speak well of you.
- Treat all the first few escorts you see this way, and I promise you won’t have any trouble after that as long as you respect the wishes of those who have a posted lower age limit. If you try to approach one of the ladies who do, she will take your ignoring her boundary as a sign that you’re impolite & disrespectful, and you still won’t get in to see her.
Good luck!
(Have a question of your own? Please consult this page to see if I’ve answered it in a previous column, and if not just click here to ask me via email.)
Diary #320
Posted in Diary, tagged activism, blogging, New York, Presents on August 16, 2016| 1 Comment »
An awful lot of stuff happened last week, but unfortunately I can’t tell you about most of it yet. There was a conference call I can’t tell you about yet, and I was consulted about an unpleasantness I can’t tell you about yet, and there were some developments in a project I can’t tell you about yet, and of course I can’t tell you about anything that happened with clients (though there were several notable developments, most of them good). Then there were some other things I could tell you about but would rather not, and a couple of others I might like to tell you about, but you wouldn’t understand or wouldn’t care. So even though I was so busy last week I barely had time to breathe, there’s very little to report in this column. I’m going to dinner tonight with a young sex worker who flatters me by listening to my war stories, and I’m getting yet another beauty treatment on Thursday. Last week I did receive a very early birthday present from Jeremy Dunn, the book you see me holding here (which was the most recent addition to my Amazon wishlist), and on Sunday my book became available on Walmart’s website, which I’m hoping generates a lot of sales! But I’m afraid that’s pretty much it for this time, except for announcing that I’m going to be in New York City from September 14th to 19th, so if you’d like to see me in that time you’ve got less than a month to let me know!
Just Another Day in America
Posted in Current Events, The Dark Side, Tyranny, tagged consensual crime, cops, Maryland, racism, rape, To Molest and Rape, weaponry on August 15, 2016| 1 Comment »
This victim seems like a conniving little whore. – Baltimore prosecutor, name withheld by “authorities”
So the US Department of “Justice” has released its long-awaited report on the Baltimore police department, the product of an investigation which was begun after public outcry over the murder by torture of a young black man named Freddie Gray. Gray was arrested under the pretext that he possessed an “illegal” weapon (a switchblade, like the one I carried in my purse in high school); like all prohibitionist laws, those against “weapon possession” (including the “gun control” laws so beloved by modern “progressives” and racist conservatives of the ’60s) are disproportionately enforced against minorities, and used as excuses for the overpolicing which has decimated black communities (New York’s much-hated “stop and frisk” policy was a gun control measure). But middle-class Americans in general (and white middle-class Americans in particular) have developed an ingenious defense against recognizing the ubiquitous rot in our society: they hyperfocus on one particularly blatant example, demand that “something be done” about it, and then smugly congratulate themselves on their enlightenment while ignoring the myriad other examples of exactly the same species of rot that surround them on every side. The media attention to the Baltimore investigation is a perfect example of the syndrome: it all tacitly assumes that the Baltimore police department is some kind of unique blot on the otherwise-spotless escutcheon of American policing, when in fact it is an extremely typical exemplar of the authoritarian cancer which utterly permeates the US body politic.
Take this Vox article about the report, for example; it speaks of “revelations” and “damning findings” as though it were about to unveil some shocking secrets, but absolutely nothing it mentions is outside the business as usual of US police departments. It quotes the report as saying, “This conduct is not only criminal, it is an abuse of power.” That’s true, but it’s a ubiquitous abuse of power which is so inherent in the machinery of prohibition that New South Wales decriminalized prostitution for the express purpose of eliminating that particular avenue of police corruption. Barely the week passes that I don’t feature at least one or two examples of rapist cops (as of this writing, over 100 of them so far this year in the US alone), and in the past few years there have been several examples of the systemic pervasiveness of cops raping sex workers that were so egregious that even the badge-licking US media couldn’t ignore them (such as the recent scandal in Oakland). As the above-linked Vox article notes,
According to the Cato Institute’s National Police Misconduct Reporting Project, sexual misconduct is the second most common form of police misconduct after excessive force. An investigation by the Associated Press last year showed that from 2008 to 2014, around 1,000 officers lost their badges for sexual misconduct: 550 officers were decertified for sexual assault, including [rape]…440 other officers lost their certification for other sex offenses, including child pornography, sexting juveniles, or having sex while on duty…
And it goes without saying that these are only the ones who were caught and punished, however lightly; the vast majority never face any consequences whatsoever, because they specifically target women the state has branded “criminals” for completely consensual activities over which it has no legitimate jurisdiction. This isn’t going to stop because the State makes a big show of prosecuting a few Daniel Holtzclaws or spotlighting a few Oaklands and Baltimores; as I wrote previously, the abuses “will continue to be business as usual until [the] public stops pretending otherwise and demands the abolition of prohibition”.
Links #319
Posted in Current Events, History, Links, Miscellaneous, Tyranny, tagged advertising, animals, cops, domestic violence, drugs, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, imaginative fiction, Japan, Never Call the Cops, New York, Ohio, Passive Voice, surveillance, Sweden, United Kingdom, video, weaponry on August 14, 2016| 1 Comment »
She could…have paid for the panties before she put them on. – Halmstad District Court
I discovered this darkly funny Indian insurance company commercial while reading an item featured in yesterday’s news column; don’t worry, you’ll be able to understand the plot even if you can’t understand the language. The links above it were provided by Mike Chase (“Orwell” & “marry”), Police Misconduct (“protect”), Jesse Walker (“headline”), Mike Siegel (“archaeology”), Scott Greenfield (“wrong”), Wendy Lyon (“Sweden”), Elizabeth N. Brown (“laws”), and Radley Balko (“volunteer”).
- The Orwell cometh.
- To protect and serve.
- Headline of the week.
- Arthurian archaeology.
- What could possibly go wrong?
- Sweden, the Florida of Europe.
- Because laws are more important than people.
- Do not under any circumstances even think of marrying one.
- Do I really need to say “Don’t volunteer to let them shoot at you”?
From the Archives
- It takes a special kind of obtuseness & cultural illiteracy to actually name your disguised prison “Gingerbread House”.
- What is it with stupid ex-whores who actually expect people to believe they never had sex with their clients?
- We don’t want our market disrupted, & the power is already in our hands; that’s why we can charge.
- Lone man on crusade manages to censor adult content on internet by circumventing court order.
- Cops raping whores is so ubiquitous, non-cop rapists often pose as cops to facilitate the crime.
- Why do prohibitionists always push “rescued” whores into menial garment-related work?
- As long as these laws are on the books, cops can use them against any woman they like.
- Politician says college students’ brains aren’t developed enough to handle free speech.
- Remember when communism was bad ’cause commies didn’t let people travel freely?
- NGO abducts whores’ children & brainwashes them against their mothers.
- Why would an intelligent girl with a good family & boyfriend sell her body?
- Prohibitionists want to cut off sex workers’ noses to spite their own faces.
- The reporter blames the advertising venue & the cops blame the victims.
- Mainstream journalists now question central dogma of “trafficking” cult.
- Tara Burns’ personal account of how criminalization harms sex workers.
- Amnesty International finally comes out in support of decriminalization.
- “Authorities” will call it anything to avoid saying a cop raped someone.
- Seattle sex workers fight propaganda while politicians keep making it.
- Expect this trope to become more common in the next few months.
- Al-Jazeera wants us to believe in a whole “sex trafficking” country.
- Ah, so “flat rate” isn’t actually flat rate; no wonder the girls like it!
- Why doesn’t an escort’s performance turn into real sexual desire?
- A letter to Amnesty International in support of decriminalization.
- Mistress Matisse talks to Huffington Post about “sex trafficking”.
- Cops, government, authoritarianism, Rock Sugar & much more.
- I really, really love it when Jacob Sullum tears into Nick Kristof.
- Prohibitionist steals confidential reports, writes play from ’em.
- Marijke Vonk on “sex trafficking” hysteria in the Netherlands.
- Another example of the effectiveness of disruptive protests.
- Now useful idiots don’t even need to dial a phone to snitch!
- Pennsylvania expands its already-bad asset forfeiture laws.
- Lock up your children! Sex traffickers are EVERYWHERE!!!
- A harlot in a world of high fantasy finds a new clientele.
- Imagine the NOW going to bat for sex workers like this.
- Cops, beauty, signage, the ACLU & spontaneous order.
- My visits to Boston, New York & other nearby cities.
- Paying with cash is now a “sign of sex trafficking”.
- What actually happened here is anybody’s guess.
- Aya de Leon on prohibitionist “documentaries”.
- The War on Whores is the new War on Drugs.
- Welcome to our world, surrogate mothers.
- The Economist calls for decriminalization.
- Super-ally Elizabeth Nolan Brown again.
- Once in a while a reporter wakes up.
- “Politicians lie” = “the sky is blue”.
- Even Godwin’s Law can be funny.
- Criticism of the “Cupcake Girls”.
- The dangers of findomming.
- I’m sure you feel safer now.
- Cops are liars everywhere.
- A busy week in Oklahoma.
- Rapist cop of the week.
- Strippers vs. fundies.



